Senate Bill

SB 289

Unlawful discrimination.

In plain English

Repeals the law on university diversity committees and prohibits unlawful discrimination in education, public employment, and licensure. Bars public employers and licensing rules from requiring training or affirmations that people with a certain personal characteristic are inherently superior or inferior, should be blamed for past actions, or have their moral character set by that characteristic, and lets injured people sue for damages and court orders. The bill also changes teaching scholarship criteria and makes other changes.

Written by AI from the official digest below, and checked only by automated rules. If they differ, the official digest and bill text control.

Official digest

Repeals provisions concerning university diversity committees. Prohibits unlawful discrimination in education, public employment, and licensure. Allows participation in public contracts by a minority business enterprise, women's business enterprise, and veteran business enterprise, as currently authorized by law. Permits scholarships based on a personal characteristic of the recipient if the scholarship is not funded by state funds or resources, and permits the renewal of specified state funded minority teaching scholarships for those recipients who were initially awarded the scholarship before July 1, 2025. Changes the criteria for certain state funded teaching scholarships from minority status to residence in an underserved county and an agreement to teach in an underserved county. Prohibits requiring as a condition of licensure that a person affirm that a person with a certain personal characteristic: (1) is inherently superior or inferior to a person with a different personal characteristic; (2) should be blamed for actions committed in the past; or (3) has a moral character that is determined by a personal characteristic of the person. Prohibits a public employer from requiring training asserting that, or implementing the theory that, a person with a certain personal characteristic: (1) is inherently superior or inferior to a person with a different personal characteristic; (2) should be blamed for actions committed in the past; or (3) has a moral character that is determined by a personal characteristic of the person. Permits a person injured by a violation to bring a civil action for actual damages, court costs, and injunctive relief.

Latest action: Public Law 196, May 6, 2025Full text and history at iga.in.gov

Authors and sponsors

Gary Byrne, Tyler Johnson, Chris Jeter

Co-authors and co-sponsors: Jim Tomes, Mike Young, Blake Doriot, Scott Alexander, Randy Maxwell, Wendy McNamara, Shane Lindauer

Roll-call votes

5 recorded votes, oldest first. Third-reading votes decide whether a bill passes a chamber; amendment votes and procedural motions are listed too.

Senate · Feb 4, 2025

Second reading: amendment

Roll call text: SB 289 - Byrne - 2nd Reading

Failed

10 yes39 no1 did not vote

Republicans: 0 yes, 38 no, 1 did not voteDemocrats: 10 yes, 0 noNot matched to a current member: 0 yes, 1 no

How each member voted

Senate · Feb 6, 2025

Third reading: vote to pass

Roll call text: SB 289 - Byrne - 3rd Reading

Passed

34 yes13 no3 did not vote

Republicans: 33 yes, 4 no, 2 did not voteDemocrats: 0 yes, 9 no, 1 did not voteNot matched to a current member: 1 yes, 0 no

How each member voted

House · Apr 14, 2025

Third reading: vote to pass

Roll call text: SB 289 - Jeter - 3rd Reading

Passed

67 yes27 no6 did not vote

Republicans: 67 yes, 0 no, 3 did not voteDemocrats: 0 yes, 26 no, 2 did not voteIndependents: 0 yes, 0 no, 1 did not voteNot matched to a current member: 0 yes, 1 no

How each member voted

Yes (67)

No (27)

Did not vote (6)

Senate · Apr 24, 2025

Final vote: concurrence or conference report

Roll call text: SB 289 - Byrne

Passed

34 yes16 no

Republicans: 33 yes, 6 noDemocrats: 0 yes, 10 noNot matched to a current member: 1 yes, 0 no

How each member voted

House · Apr 24, 2025

Final vote: concurrence or conference report

Roll call text: SB 289 - Jeter

Passed

64 yes26 no10 did not vote

Republicans: 64 yes, 0 no, 6 did not voteDemocrats: 0 yes, 24 no, 4 did not voteIndependents: 0 yes, 1 noNot matched to a current member: 0 yes, 1 no

How each member voted

Yes (64)

No (26)

Did not vote (10)

Source: Open States, compiled from the Indiana General Assembly's official roll calls. The official record at iga.in.gov controls. Spot an error? Let us know.