House Bill

HB 1389

Adoption and foster care matters.

In plain English

Prohibits a government entity from discriminating against a person in adoption and foster care matters because of the person's sincerely held religious belief, unless it is required to advance a compelling government interest by the least restrictive means. Allows a government entity to consider whether a person shares a child's or parent's religion when placing a child. Lets a person sue or raise a claim or defense in court, with a two year time limit.

Written by AI from the official digest below, and checked only by automated rules. If they differ, the official digest and bill text control.

Official digest

Prohibits a governmental entity from discriminating against a person in adoption and foster care matters based on the person's sincerely held religious belief, unless the discriminatory act as applied to the person is required to advance a compelling government interest and is the least restrictive means of advancing the interest. Specifies that a governmental entity may consider whether a person involved in adoption or foster care matters shares the same religion or faith tradition as a child or the child's parent when considering placement of a child. Allows a person to bring a cause of action against a governmental entity for discriminating against the person, or raise a violation as a claim or defense in a judicial proceeding, and allows for certain remedies. Provides that there is a two year statute of limitation for a discrimination claim.

Latest action: Signed by the Governor, February 26, 2026Full text and history at iga.in.gov

Authors and sponsors

Shane Lindauer, Tyler Johnson, Greg Walker, Stacey Donato

Co-authors and co-sponsors: Chris Jeter, Dale DeVon, Bob Heaton, Spencer Deery, Gary Byrne, Liz Brown, Brian Buchanan, Mike Gaskill, Scott Alexander

Roll-call votes

5 recorded votes, oldest first. Third-reading votes decide whether a bill passes a chamber; amendment votes and procedural motions are listed too.

House · Jan 29, 2026

Second reading: amendment

Roll call text: HB 1389 - Lindauer - 2nd Reading

Failed

26 yes63 no11 did not vote

Republicans: 0 yes, 62 no, 7 did not voteDemocrats: 26 yes, 0 no, 4 did not voteIndependents: 0 yes, 1 no

How each member voted

Yes (26)

No (63)

Did not vote (11)

House · Jan 29, 2026

Second reading: amendment

Roll call text: HB 1389 - Lindauer - 2nd Reading

Failed

29 yes62 no9 did not vote

Republicans: 1 yes, 61 no, 7 did not voteDemocrats: 28 yes, 0 no, 2 did not voteIndependents: 0 yes, 1 no

How each member voted

Yes (29)

No (62)

Did not vote (9)

House · Feb 2, 2026

Third reading: vote to pass

Roll call text: HB 1389 - Lindauer - 3rd Reading

Passed

69 yes29 no2 did not vote

Republicans: 68 yes, 0 no, 1 did not voteDemocrats: 0 yes, 29 no, 1 did not voteIndependents: 1 yes, 0 no

How each member voted

Yes (69)

No (29)

Did not vote (2)

Senate · Feb 17, 2026

Third reading: vote to pass

Roll call text: HB 1389 - Johnson T - 3rd Reading

Passed

44 yes0 no6 did not vote

Republicans: 36 yes, 0 no, 4 did not voteDemocrats: 8 yes, 0 no, 2 did not vote

How each member voted

House · Feb 19, 2026

Final vote: concurrence or conference report

Roll call text: HB 1389 - Lindauer

Passed

84 yes12 no4 did not vote

Republicans: 66 yes, 0 no, 3 did not voteDemocrats: 17 yes, 12 no, 1 did not voteIndependents: 1 yes, 0 no

How each member voted

Yes (84)

No (12)

Did not vote (4)

Source: Open States, compiled from the Indiana General Assembly's official roll calls. The official record at iga.in.gov controls. Spot an error? Let us know.