Senate Bill

SB 240

Surplus interconnection service.

In plain English

Defines "surplus interconnection service" as unused grid connection capacity at a power plant that is not expected to be needed. Requires large electric utilities to analyze using it in resource plans filed after December 31, 2029, and requires state regulators to consider it when reviewing new power plant requests. Requires the Indiana utility regulatory commission to study its use and report findings in its 2027 annual report.

Written by AI from the official digest below, and checked only by automated rules. If they differ, the official digest and bill text control.

Official digest

Defines "surplus interconnection service" (SIS), with respect to established interconnection service connecting an electric generating facility with an electric transmission system, as any portion of that service that: (1) has not been used; and (2) is not reasonably expected to be needed; the use of which would result in the total amount of interconnection service at the point of interconnection remaining the same. Provides that an electric utility that is required to file integrated resource plans (IRPs) with the Indiana utility regulatory commission (IURC) must include in any IRP filed after December 31, 2029, an analysis of the potential for SIS to meet immediate needs for capacity and energy at utility owned facilities. Provides that with respect to any petition filed with the IURC after December 31, 2029, for a certificate of public convenience and necessity for the construction, purchase, or lease of an electric generation facility, the IURC shall consider whether: (1) the petitioner has conducted an analysis of the use of SIS as an alternative to, or in conjunction with, the proposed construction, purchase, or lease of the facility; and (2) the proposed construction, use, or lease of the facility will make use of, or allow for the use of, SIS. Requires the IURC to conduct a study to evaluate the potential use of SIS by electric utilities. Sets forth specific topics that the IURC must evaluate as part of the study. Requires the IURC to include in its 2027 annual report its findings with respect to the topics evaluated in the study.

Latest action: Signed by the Governor, March 5, 2026Full text and history at iga.in.gov

Authors and sponsors

Eric Koch, Stacey Donato, Spencer Deery, Ed Soliday

Co-authors and co-sponsors: Jean Leising, Blake Doriot, Andrea Hunley, Daryl Schmitt, Dave Hall, Jim Pressel, Alex Burton

Roll-call votes

3 recorded votes, oldest first. Third-reading votes decide whether a bill passes a chamber; amendment votes and procedural motions are listed too.

Senate · Jan 22, 2026

Third reading: vote to pass

Roll call text: SB 240 - Koch - 3rd Reading

Passed

44 yes1 no4 did not vote

Republicans: 35 yes, 0 no, 4 did not voteDemocrats: 9 yes, 1 no

How each member voted

House · Feb 10, 2026

Third reading: vote to pass

Roll call text: SB 240 - Soliday - 3rd Reading

Passed

96 yes0 no4 did not vote

Republicans: 65 yes, 0 no, 4 did not voteDemocrats: 30 yes, 0 noIndependents: 1 yes, 0 no

How each member voted

Yes (96)

Did not vote (4)

Senate · Feb 25, 2026

Final vote: concurrence or conference report

Roll call text: SB 240 - Koch

Passed

47 yes0 no3 did not vote

Republicans: 38 yes, 0 no, 2 did not voteDemocrats: 9 yes, 0 no, 1 did not vote

How each member voted

Source: Open States, compiled from the Indiana General Assembly's official roll calls. The official record at iga.in.gov controls. Spot an error? Let us know.